Credit
Discovery dates and authorship should match reality, not whoever paid last.
Truth in Research
Personal testimony · Ayman Timjicht · Science
This site records one researcher’s journey: questions asked in a classroom, work done with difficulty and courage, and what happened when discoveries were credited to others. The issue is not only one person it is whether justice can exist when immorality is repeated.
Read the storyAs a student in Agadir, I asked a professor—Salim Al Bazzi—about Gödel’s paradox because I did not understand it. He told me to email him if I found something about it.
I later found what I believed was a simple approach to a problem I understood as the Riemann paradox, with an explanation of my work attached. I am dyslexic: my spelling and handwriting were not always correct, but the words I meant often sounded the same when written. That should not erase the ideas behind them.
He told me to forget my work until another year.
In a network class, the professor said he had sold it. I was devastated. In February 2021 I stepped back from that subject and turned to something else: the Collatz conjecture. I had never published before. When recognition came, I did not know what to do next. A family friend offered to help me publish; she asked someone she knew.
Then I saw a video on YouTube claiming the Collatz conjecture was solved. Their solution was wrong, they said—but they also said they had sold my work. Rumors spread that the King of Morocco was involved; from what I was told, those rumors were correct. Someone advised me that sharing work on social media counts as publication, so I began to share openly.
This section describes harassment, sexual coercion, device intrusion, and alleged non-consensual interference. Reader discretion is advised.
During my school years, I was subjected to harassment. That experience began before the research disputes described elsewhere on this site, and it shaped how vulnerable I already was when I trusted teachers and others with my work.
Later, I was blackmailed at work and pressured to engage in sexual intercourse. I refused. As a result, I was subjected to abuse and mistreatment until I could no longer endure it. Refusal should not be punished; it was used against me as if consent could be coerced through fear and power.
I also describe methods involving waves that those responsible claim were discovered by Nikola Tesla, used to interfere with brain waves. I record this here as part of the full account of how I was targeted—not as established science on this page, but as conduct I experienced and want on the public record.
My devices are hacked. I believe my communications and data are monitored and tampered with. Because the King of Morocco has a hand in what happened to me—as I was told and as rumors indicated—I do not feel I can go to the police. Reporting locally would not be safe when power reaches that level. That is why this public record matters: it is one of the few channels left to speak without assuming protection from institutions I cannot trust.
This section discusses drug glamorization in media, pornography, and harm to young people. Reader discretion is advised.
They also use media and songs to sabotage me. Beyond my own case, I believe the same tools are used on a generation: music, video, pornography, and screens are pushed in ways that create addiction and silence people who might resist.
When a young person sees a favorite rapper use weed again and again, they start to ask what weed is and what its effects are. Curiosity becomes experimentation, and experimentation becomes addiction. The lyrics, in my view, contribute to a wider decline in society—not only through drugs, but by normalizing self-destruction and emptiness as culture.
Pornography is used to keep people quiet. It ties the mind to the screen through adrenaline and repeated stimulation. For young people especially, it can reduce healthy hormonal balance (including testosterone) while making the unacceptable seem acceptable. People who might speak out are drained, ashamed, or addicted before they find their voice.
Reward pathways in the brain—dopamine and related “excitotoxin”-style overstimulation— are exploited to keep users attached to screens. Screen addiction grows; young people carry that addiction on phones, tablets, and computers everywhere they go. Devices that should educate instead become channels for pornography, degrading songs, and endless scrolling.
Pornography, dirty and manipulative songs, and deliberate screen addiction should stop. This content should be removed—not celebrated, not algorithm-fed to children, and not used as a weapon against those who refuse to comply. Protecting young minds is not censorship of truth; it is refusing to profit from their damage.
These are areas where I claim original contribution. Details belong in the posts and documents I have shared publicly; this page is the narrative frame.
Question raised in class; follow-up work sent by email at the professor’s request.
A simple solution I understood as addressing the Riemann paradox, with written explanation.
Solution developed after letting the earlier subject go (February 2021). Manuscripts and articles are in the Articles section.
Algorithm intended to improve performance of search agents (e.g. large-scale web search), shared before widespread AI agents like ChatGPT.
Hundreds of additional scientific posts on platforms such as Quora, from an earlier account that was later banned.
These are some of my articles about the Collatz conjecture. After I shared my story, they were not accepted—even when I believe the mathematics is correct. You can read them here and search for more of my work on OSF, Zenodo, Figshare, and GitHub under the name Ayman Timjicht.
Additional articles and materials may appear on these platforms. Use search for Ayman Timjicht or Collatz, or contact me if you need a direct link to a specific deposit.
When work is “sold,” I was told, the record changes: the date of discovery is moved backward, and the reward goes to someone else. I trusted another professor with the search optimization idea; I was told that work was sold as well.
After an earthquake that killed thousands of people in my country, I asked that innocent people not be harmed in this way. The reply I received was a death threat—to remove my organs and give them to dogs. I was terrified. It was not the right moment for that conversation; I knew starting it then was dangerous, but silence also has a cost.
They are killing scientists. When someone discovers or speaks a truth that power cannot buy or bury, the response is not always argument—it is elimination. I am not alone in fearing that pattern; it stretches across history.
The truth about Albert Einstein, as I have come to understand it, is that he was killed. Those responsible did not only erase the living person—they kept his head in a wall, as if to display victory over the mind that challenged them. Whether that is literal or symbolic, the message is the same: truth-tellers can be destroyed, and their remains can be turned into a warning.
I record this here because my own experience—work sold, threats, rejection of articles—sits on the same continuum: science is attacked when it refuses to serve lies.
Scientific research is supposed to advance human knowledge under rules of honesty: who discovered what, when, and with what evidence. When immorality is repeated—sale of ideas, erased authorship, intimidation—the harm is not only to one dyslexic student from Agadir. It corrupts the idea that truth can be pursued fairly.
I am not asking the world to accept every claim without scrutiny. I am asking that the process be examined: credit, dates, threats, and the use of power when a vulnerable person has no institutional publisher behind them.
Discovery dates and authorship should match reality, not whoever paid last.
Dyslexia and spelling must not be used to dismiss substantive mathematics or science.
Death threats, blackmail, and coercion—including sexual pressure at work—are never acceptable.
Refusal must not trigger retaliation, abuse, or mistreatment in any setting.
Everyone should be able to report crimes to the police without fear that power at the highest level makes justice impossible.
If social media is offered as publication, banning the account that carries the work is a contradiction.
Children should not be groomed into drug, sexual, or screen addiction through media they cannot escape on their devices.
Researchers must not be killed, threatened, or displayed as trophies for refusing to serve power instead of truth.
If you wish to respond, verify details, or offer help, you can reach me by email or WhatsApp.